spitballing in list bc lazy:
-> imo as Someone Who Has Absolutely Never Staffed And Never Will, "look, our canons need to be the most powerful/influential/whatever characters on site for the plot to function properly, so you should read the bios of established canon characters and make your characters have less of those traits or you might get a pend" is an absolutely acceptable boundary for staff to have. some people would have an issue with this, but i think they'd be in the minority -- in my experience, the majority of the RP community wants to play nice with one another. (and honestly, if said site you're talking about is perhaps in a beta test or soft open, it's...at most rude but understandable to ask people to walk characters back before official launch if you're transparent about the reasoning.)
-> could give every member one(-two?) non-canon "influential character" slot(s?) for characters which have a quote-unquote power level just a step below canon characters. i'd make this an "as you register" benefit rather than a purchased one, since if fuckhands mcmike wants to start off as their kool hitman but also wants to make their barista later down the line, they're gucci.
-> oddly enough, this post made me think of an anecdote valka mentioned a long ass time ago (aka valk pls if you're lurking don't smite me if i paraphrase u wrong from a post i'm pretty sure you wrote on wicked wonderland in 2018) where she was talking about how cherry city riot/chaos theory was originally penned as a larger heaven vs. hell site which coincidentally also had open races. members really, really liked the open races bit and tended to favor the "slice of life" side and, after a while, the site plot shifted to accommodate, and the site ran for quite a few more years.
tl;dr bitch get to the point if the memberbase is showing a tendency to prefer political intrigue over slice of life, it could be beneficial to try and take a look at powerbalancing through the lens of "we're a political intrigue site with slice of life elements" in place of "we're a slice of life site with political intrigue elements". obviously, you shouldn't transform the site into something you wouldn't like enough to staff long-term (because nothing kills a site dead in the water like unmotivated staff) and if you really, really don't want to staff a site like that, hey -- that's 100% justifiable. but i think considering the tendencies members have shown in their characters & plotting in regards to power balancing might be beneficial and could certainly help out a lot in the pr section.
|