Everyone here uses art not produced by themself following their obsession with aesthetic first and morals second. Your "free advertising" is worth literally cents to the artists you steal from to edit the shit out of their artwork.
Some of you make site skins populated entirely with stolen artwork to earn actual money. Those same people are acting like they have the moral authority to define what is and isn't stealing in this thread and drawing a line that conveniently benefits themselves.As a very long time lurker and after the post above this one, I wanted to make an account and say I agree with most of this sentiment. Minus the last part of course lol.
(What I'm about to say obviously excludes those that draw their own stuff, have their characters commissioned, and gaining permission from the artists themselves to use their work. Also, please recognize that when I use "you", this is not aimed at anyone here. This is just for argument sake.)
By the looks of it, this all really falls back to consent than actual crediting considering that the argument here is that you can't credit an artist with AI and using their work without permission... yet just because you credit something does not mean you actually gotten permission. That doesn't change the fact you did not get explicit consent for an artist to use their work. I mean, it's nice you're giving some free exposure to an artist whose style you may fancy, but were you given the green light? Did they tell you, "Sure! Go right ahead!" or did you ignore their request when they say "do not repost" but do it anyway, yet you credit still thinking you did good because, "Hey, at least I'm giving credit where it's due!" If the foundation of this whole debate is around consent and you don't have that, but you use it anyway and give credit... then yes, I do think they're the same.
And ESPECIALLY the bolded part! I'm surprised no one even called this out. Some skinners are using artwork without permission (if not mentioned) and making a profit out of it. I find that to be really hypocritical and how you could even try to have some sort of moral high ground and be judgemental to those that use AI. I am pretty sure one person mentioned that they don't even use AI for commercial use, which is FAR worse than using it for personal use if you want me to pick between the two evils.
As someone else has said, at the end of the day, people will do what they want so as long as they're not hurting anyone. I do not at all judge anyone that uses AI or someone who uses artwork without consent BUT does credit the artist. We can have our opinions on this subject and that's completely fine. This is a hobby we all enjoy partaking in and to have fun in.
I just really don't like how one side is being portrayed as the villain when the other side isn't really as better as you think it is when you get passed the surface level of it.
Edit: I decided to remove the last part of the quoted post because it was very uncalled for. I also want to add that in regards to the whole going artless, I don't think it'd be possible to do that in the first place. The majority of people like to have a clear reference of what a character looks like. Lots of us like looking at pretty stuff, and that's okay! Myself included! The same with skins and templates. Look at how much more aesthetic they've grown! I'm not even mad at it. Roleplay has evolved so much than what it first became, and I don't think it's possible to regress.