I'd say the plotters and the improvisers each just have different strengths and different weaknesses. I think most people are more in the middle than not, though. Rarely is anyone purely one way or the other.
An analogy I used for my own plotting-style is this: I'm directing a boat on an unpredictable sea, charting the stars to guide me to my destination. Those 'guiding lights' are things like character motivations, existing character dynamics, site plots, etc. I keep those things in mind, and I try to use them to direct where I go. Sometimes the sky is clear and the sea is calm, so directing is easy. Other times, the sky is so full of clouds I can't determine where I'm going, so I just trust the current to guide me safely. Either way, the story should take me where I want to go.
Plotting too rigidly can make you inflexible, but understanding the inherent nature of plotting makes you better at creating satisfying character beats and capitalizing on opportunities when they arise. Improvising too blindly can lead to outcomes you don't necessarily want, but understanding how and when to improvise allows you to riff when you hit unexpected storylines, and lets you discover unexpected synergies that change your overall story in rewarding ways.
But all this requires follow-through. If you don't write posts at all, nothing happens. Whether it's plotted out or improvised. I've seen both 'types' of writers struggle to finish writing a story for different reasons.
|