This conversation is interesting.
I've been "in" the clique and "out" of the clique, but here's the thing: they're unavoidable. We're humans and we gather with the like minded of our herd, sometimes not realizing this does us more harm than good. Digital tribalism at its finest. A community is only as good as the work put in by the villagers. It takes a village to make a site work, and some admins forget that they need new blood to keep the heart pumping; whilst members, used to one another, need a reminder that a leader's role is to lead. I would expect an admin/moderator/etc to exact fair dealings with their member base without being bias — does that happen, though? Not as often as we'd all like. Which ends up boiling down to conversations like these being had, rehashing certain talking points. We're all on the same page mostly. No one likes being treated like an outcast. Everyone has their favorite (s), too.
Though I've learned that not taking things too seriously is the key to keeping a level head about the RP community. Not everyone will like me (and for good reason, I was… not cool to be associated with once upon a time); not every site's community will embrace me into its thick of plots. I had long since realized the clan I used to rock with, follow along, join every site made and lovingly created… don't mesh. Sad at first, but we cope with harder things in our lives, lmao. I'll live and so will they. Make your own community. Live by the rules to seek to be followed. I think most RP sites should be privated or invite only nowadays. We are seeing a trend of people saying "I like xyz's site idea!" But it's a crapshot if they actually join it; lotta bark, no bite. It's great to show interest, but only walking that walk and talking that talk will get us back to those "golden days" where sites were flowing hot.
This got off track but I swear there's a message in there. It's 3am.
|